Now we can start using hashcat with the rockyou wordlist to crack the MD5 hashes. The rockyou wordlist comes pre-installed with Kali. If you are not using Kali you can use another wordlist, or download it from here.
Crack mysql password hash calculator
Now all you need to know is that to crack a hash with n bits of entropy, on average you need to try 2n-1 times. So take a password consisting of 8 random lower case letters for instance. It has an entropy of n = log2(268) = 38 bits. To crack it you would need 238-1/1000 seconds = 4 years.
The impracticality of trying all combinations leads to other strategies, such as instead choosing dictionary words or "Markov Chains" to test the sorts of passwords are likely to choose, instead of trying all random combinations. You can't mathematically calculate how fast this is because it's entirely subjective. It depends upon luck, what passwords the targets have chosen, and what passwords you've chosen to test. It's often something of the order of a 10% chance of cracking a password with a few hours of cracking, but again, that's subjective experience. Depending on whose password you are cracking and how you are cracking it, your experience will vary.
HashCat claims that their software is the world's fastest, and the current version is v6.2.5. I also found a Blog report which claimed that there is a password cracker, which is an 8-GPU rig able to crack an MD5 hashed 8 character password in 4 hours using the brute force method.
It really depends on how you define "cracking rig" and how you define "fastest", but for SHA-256 hashes at least, the Bitcoin mining network recently peaked at around 214 Million Trillion hashes/second (214 EH/s). If you're looking for a worst-case scenario to use for calculating crack times for weak hashes like SHA-256, that's about as bad as it gets.
With this in mind, I was interested to know how many passwords I could crack with a limited budget of less than $100 and few days. Performing a similar experiment against your own database will help you evaluate the effectiveness of your own password policy. You are about to discover that it is easier than you might think. In fact, most of the password "recovery" tools can handle Django's password encryption format out-of-the-box.
I tested this approach on few different real-world datasets and was able to recover 10-25% of the hashes in each set within a few hours. In all, I cracked 246 passwords and spent $73 on Google Cloud. My cost per recovered hash came out to $0.30.
More password cracking action from Null Byte! Today we aren't going to be cracking passwords per se, rather, we are going to learn the basics of generating rainbow tables and how to use them. First, let's go over how passwords are stored and recovered.
Passwords are normally stored in one-way hashes. When a password is created, the user types the password in what is called "plain text", since it is in a plain, unhashed form. However, after a password is made, the computer stores a one-way hash of the password that obfuscates it. Hashes are made to be one-way, which means algorithmic reversal is impossible. This means we have to crack those hashes!
Normally, when you crack a password hash, your computer computes a word, generates the hash, then compares to see if there is a match. If there is, the password is correct; if not, it will keep guessing. Rainbow tables work on the principle of a time-memory trade-off. This means that hashes are pre-generated by a computer and stored in a large rainbow table file with all of the hashes and words that correspond to them. This method works especially well for people with slow processors, since you don't have to compute much. Rainbow cracking can greatly reduce the amount of time it takes to crack a password hash, plus you can keep the tables, so you only have to generate them once!
Rainbow tables sure are great, for a couple of years ago I made some tables just as your guide, a-z lowercase and 0-9 of maximum 6 characters.It cracked every password I tried within a couple of minutes, and this was done on my old laptop :DCreating the tables took forever though
The RainbowCrack software cracks hashes by rainbow table lookup. Rainbow tables are ordinary files stored on the hard disk. Generally, Rainbow tables are bought online or can be compiled with different tools.
My setup is simple. I have a NVIDIA GTX 210 Graphics card in my machine running Kali Linux 1.0.6 and will use rockyou dictionary for this whole exercise. In this post, I will show How to crack few of the most common hashes
The multi-platform password cracker Ophcrack is incredibly fast. How fast? It can crack the password "Fgpyyih804423" in 160 seconds. Most people would consider that password fairly secure. The Microsoft password strength checker rates it "strong". The Geekwisdom password strength meter rates it "mediocre".
Passwords are never stored in plaintext. At least they shouldn't be, unless you're building the world's most insecure system using the world's most naive programmers. Instead, passwords are stored as the output of a hash function. Hashes are one-way operations. Even if an attacker gained access to the hashed version of your password, it's not possible to reconstitute the password from the hash value alone.
But it is possible to attack the hashed value of your password using rainbow tables: enormous, pre-computed hash values for every possible combination of characters. An attacking PC could certainly calculate all these hashes on the fly, but taking advantage of a massive table of pre-computed hash values enables the attack to proceed several orders of magnitude faster-- assuming the attacking machine has enough RAM to store the entire table (or at least most of it) in memory. It's a classic time-memory tradeoff, exactly the sort of cheating shortcut you'd expect a black hat attacker to take.
It takes a long time to generate these massive rainbow tables, but once they're out there, every attacking computer can leverage those tables to make their attacks on hashed passwords that much more potent.
The smallest rainbow table available is the basic alphanumeric one, and even it is 388 megabytes. That's the default table you get with the Ophcrack bootable ISO. Even that small-ish table is remarkably effective. I used it to attack some passwords I set up in a Windows XP virtual machine with the following results:
You wouldn't expect this rainbow table to work on the passwords with non-alphanumeric characters (%&^$# and the like) because the table doesn't contain those characters. You'll also note that that passphrases, which I am a big fan of, are immune to this technique due to their length. But then again, this attack covered 99.9% of all possible 14 character alphanumeric passwords in 11 minutes, and that was with the smallest of the available rainbow tables. We could do better by using larger, more complete rainbow tables. The Ophcrack documentation describes the differences between the available rainbow tables it uses:
The Ophcrack tool isn't very flexible. It doesn't allow you to generate your own rainbow tables. For that, you'll need to use the Project Rainbow Crack tools, which can be used to attack almost any character set and any hashing algorithm. But beware. There's a reason rainbow table attacks have only emerged recently, as the price of 2 to 4 gigabytes of memory in a desktop machine have approached realistic levels. When I said massive, I meant it. Here are some generated rainbow table sizes for the more secure NT hash:
But when a remote hacker obtains a large list of hashed passwords from a server or database, we're in trouble. There's significant risk from a rainbow table attack. That's why you should never rely on hashes alone-- always add some salt to your hash so the resulting hash values are unique. Salting a hash sounds complicated (and vaguely delicious), but it's quite simple. You prefix a unique value to the password before hashing it:
If you've salted your password hashes, an attacker can't use a rainbow table attack against you-- the hash results from "password" and "deliciously-salty-password" won't match. Unless your hacker somehow knows that all your hashes are "delicously-salty-" ones. Even then, he or she would have to generate a custom rainbow table specifically for you.
UPDATE: Please read Thomas Ptacek's excellent and informative response to this post. It goes into much more detal about the nuts and bolts of password hashing. Unlike me, Thomas is a real security expert.
Hashing is often confused with encryption. A simple difference is that hashed data is not reversible. Encrypted data can be reversed using a key. This is why applications like Telegram use encryption while passwords are hashed.
When we signup for a website, they will hash our password before saving it (hopefully!). When we try to log in again, the same hashing algorithm is used to generate a hash for our input. It is then compared with the original hash saved in the database.
This approach is also what gives rise to hashing attacks. A simple way to attack hashes is to have a list of common passwords hashed together. This list is called a Rainbow table. Interesting name for a table of hashes.
Hashcat is also one of the few tools that can work with the GPU. While CPUs are great for sequential tasks, GPUs have powerful parallel processing capabilities. GPUs are used in Gaming, Artificial intelligence, and can also be used to speed up password cracking.
As we saw in our example above, a dictionary attack is performed by using a wordlist. A dictionary attack is also the default option in Hashcat. The better the wordlist is, the greater the chances of cracking the password.
The mask attack is similar to the dictionary attack, but it is more specific. Brute-force approaches like dictionary attacks can take a long time to crack a password. But if we have information regarding the password, we can use that to speed up the time it takes to crack the password. 2ff7e9595c
Comments